COVID-19 is a Chinese Bioweapon

From: Razz (RAZZMAN)29 Mar 2021 09:18
To: Carl (SPARTACUS) 7 of 55
Early last March, I was reading articles on Natural News about this most likely being a Chinese bioweapon which was developed to weaken the U.S. and the democratic Western countries. Dr. Robert Redfield points out that this most likely came from lab experiments in China, not from a "wet market."

Here's some of what Redfield said on that special last night:

Dr. Robert Redfield, the director of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention under Trump, said he believes the novel coronavirus began transmitting in the fall of 2019 and may have originated in a lab in China.

Redfield cited no evidence. The "lab leak" theory has been cited in pandemic conspiracies, including in statements from Trump.

"I am of the point of view that I still think the most likely aetiology of this pathogen in Wuhan was from a laboratory. You know, escaped. Other people don't believe that. That's fine. Science will eventually figure it out," Redfield said, noting that this may not have been intentional.

A World Health Organization team is exploring the origins of the virus in Wuhan, China, and has noted that it is "extremely unlikely" that a lab-related incident spurred the global pandemic.

Meanwhile, Chinese officials and state media have promoted an unsubstantiated, so-called "multiple-origin" theory, suggesting the pandemic may have started in various locations around the world, even a US military lab.

Redfield said there could have been a significant benefit to having US investigators on the ground in China to study the coronavirus early in the pandemic.
"I think we could have learned very quickly that we're dealing with a different beast than the one that everyone had sold us," Redfield said.

"A year after this pathogen started, we're now having a critical analysis of where it came from by scientists," he added. "That just seems a little delayed. I mean, it seems to me that some of the information is people are not being transparent about it. I could use the word 'cover up,' but I don't know that so I'm not going to speculate that."

China has denied any cover up.

"They sold us: 'This is like SARS.' 'This is like flu.' Well, SARS and flu, you can go after symptomatic case findings because they cause symptomatic disease," Redfield said. "Unfortunately, this virus, probably a majority of its transmission is in the non-symptomatic stage."
From: Carl (SPARTACUS)29 Mar 2021 10:05
To: Razz (RAZZMAN) 8 of 55
The fact that covid spreads even from non-symptomatic people is what is deadly. 

Do you remember the Chinese Doctor who said China was behind the whole thing. She was on Tucker Carlson and not been seen since.

The people refuting her were probably all from the World Health (Death) Organization.
From: Razz (RAZZMAN)29 Mar 2021 19:18
To: Carl (SPARTACUS) 9 of 55
I like Doctor Who and the group The Who. Don't forget the Guess Who!

I don't trust anything that comes out from that Chinese/backed institution, W.H.O.

I think that a lot of those Chinese scientists and researchers who had the nerve to speak out, are no longer talking...or breathing.
From: Carl (SPARTACUS)30 Mar 2021 08:09
To: Razz (RAZZMAN) 10 of 55
Either they are dead or hanging with the Uighurs in Western China.
From: Razz (RAZZMAN)30 Mar 2021 09:30
To: Carl (SPARTACUS) 11 of 55
My guess is that a lot of those researchers in that Chinese lab either died of the virus, or were eliminated by the Chinese government so they could never disclose the real truth. We'll never know.
From: Carl (SPARTACUS)30 Mar 2021 09:51
To: Razz (RAZZMAN) 12 of 55
Well, if Mao could kill 50 million Chinese, what are a few Wuhanians to them???
From: Razz (RAZZMAN)30 Mar 2021 10:21
To: Carl (SPARTACUS) 13 of 55
Exactly. To me it's just population control for China. What better way to release a bio-weapon? It serves two or more purposes. It gets rid of the old and weak in China, and weakens the rest of the world, setting it up for a Chinese takeover.
From: Carl (SPARTACUS)30 Mar 2021 11:53
To: Razz (RAZZMAN) 14 of 55
Maybe you ought to tell President Biden that when he is climbing some stairs. Also, Harris is supposedly in charge of fixing the border, but has set up no meetings and says she will only deal with policy issues.

Whatever your politics, one must admit things are a lot worse than they were 3 months ago.

I firmly believe the old saying: "If the first decision is wrong, the rest are wrong." Apparently Biden and his people never heard that.
From: Razz (RAZZMAN)31 Mar 2021 09:09
To: Carl (SPARTACUS) 15 of 55
I have to admit, I was in complete agreement with Trump in building the wall along the southern border. His only problem is that he didn't complete it during the 4 years in office. I know it was a massive project, but it would have helped deter the current mess down there now.
From: Carl (SPARTACUS)31 Mar 2021 10:11
To: Razz (RAZZMAN) 16 of 55
He did not complete it because of the delays in funding and the innumerable lawsuits filed by Dems looking for new voters.
From: Razz (RAZZMAN)31 Mar 2021 11:05
To: Carl (SPARTACUS) 17 of 55
It's too bad that wall wasn't completed. Now we see the results of that, along with the fact that immigrants are surging across the border because they feel they'll get a better deal with Biden.
From: Carl (SPARTACUS)31 Mar 2021 12:01
To: Razz (RAZZMAN) 18 of 55
Since when can the President sign an executive order and over rule a law approved by Congress? The wall was funded and Congress mandated it. Clearly, this is unconstitutional. Otherwise, the new President can veto stuff approved by a previous administration. I am surprised the Repub/Stupid Party is not all over this. And the media is crickets per usual.
From: Razz (RAZZMAN)31 Mar 2021 14:07
To: Carl (SPARTACUS) 19 of 55
Yea, this is difficult to understand. I don't know the legal aspects of all this, so it will be difficult for me to weigh in.
From: Carl (SPARTACUS)31 Mar 2021 16:15
To: Razz (RAZZMAN) 20 of 55
If one part of the gov can simply over ride established laws, it is unconstitutional. A president can veto a Bill, but cannot retroactively cancel it. Otherwise, what is the point of passing any bill?
From: Razz (RAZZMAN)31 Mar 2021 18:20
To: Carl (SPARTACUS) 21 of 55
I think that Presidents have used that executive order to the extreme and it probably should be put to death.
From: Carl (SPARTACUS) 1 Apr 2021 07:50
To: Razz (RAZZMAN) 22 of 55
All I am suggesting is what is the point of Congress passing a bill and then potentially years later of a President simply signing his name and killing the bill? Since there are supposed balance of powers, this makes no sense.
From: Razz (RAZZMAN) 1 Apr 2021 09:13
To: Carl (SPARTACUS) 23 of 55
That's how this government has been corrupted over the past 100 years. I agree with you. Once a law is passed by Congress, it should be untouchable except by Congress itself...or maybe the Supreme Court.
From: Carl (SPARTACUS) 1 Apr 2021 09:46
To: Razz (RAZZMAN) 24 of 55

Did you see Biden's new Stimulus proposal? It is insane. I cannot believe it will pass though I suspect it probably will. He is bankrupting the next generation for sure.
From: Razz (RAZZMAN) 1 Apr 2021 10:00
To: Carl (SPARTACUS) 25 of 55
Spend now, pay later. You are talking about the Infrastructure plan, right? The roads and bridges of this country are falling apart, though. In WNY, it's actually dangerous to drive over some of our bridges.
From: Carl (SPARTACUS) 1 Apr 2021 10:10
To: Razz (RAZZMAN) 26 of 55
A very small portion of the bill is for actual infrastructure. It is a total joke.